Friday, April 29, 2011

HBO releases new streaming service app simultaneously for both iOS and Android platforms

Want to avoid the 24/7 coverage of the royal wedding? (Ten bonus points if you don't know what this refers to.) Then you are in luck as HBO has released its streaming service app today for both Apple iOS platform, as well as Android.
Photobucket
HBO GO is a much anticipated video streaming app because it promises access to programming even over 3G. (iTunes link here, Android Market link here)

Android tablet users might be disappointed that the app does not appear to be optimized for Honeycomb, but at least it was released on the same day as the iOS app.

The app is not a revolutionary move away from the cable companies, however. Users must sign-in to their accounts through the app – in my case Comcast's Xfinity service – in order to gain access to the programming.

My own experience with the app has been really good so far: video quality is great on WiFi, that's for sure. I'll play around with 3G later.

If you subscribe to HBO there is simply no reason not to download the app: it's free, it works, and I'm sure it will come in handy on trips.

But for HBO this app is a very good idea. I was wondering whether to continue HBO. But with Treme back for a second season, and now this app, well, I guess they will continue to get my business for a while longer.

PhotobucketPhotobucket
Left: The sign-in page where users can sign-in to their existing accounts, or buy a subscription through the app; Right: the program player, in this case for the HBO series Treme.

Two approaches to launching replica editions of B2B magazines on the iPad: neither quite gets the B2B model

A recent conversation I had with a consumer magazine professional went like this: "I understand the consumer magazine business, but B2B is beyond me," said the consumer mag pro. "It's beyond most B2B media executives, as well," I said.

Besides being snarky, I made the comment to tell a basic truth: too many heads of B2B publishing companies have either forgotten their own business models, or never knew them to begin with.
Photobucket
The model is simple: B2B magazines attract and serve their readers in order to attract industry advertising. In order to attract industry advertising the publisher has to prove that the movers and shakers of a particular industry actually read the magazine – usually through a good BPA statement. But if the editorial content is really good – that is, essential to readers – then the magazine can sell subscriptions; AdAge or Engineering News Record being two examples. If not, then the magazines are given away free to qualified readers.

It's a simple formula, that current seems beyond the grasp of far too many B2B media execs. In order to cut costs and maintain profits they have eliminated their BPA statements, lowered the quality of the editorial, and now are beginning to give away their product to anyone who can download an app.



I downloaded two B2B magazines this morning, thinking that one of them was going to provide a good model for B2B publishers. Unfortunately, once downloaded, the actual app varied considerably from the screenshots used in the app description. In the end, neither app really adheres to the basics of good B2B publishing.

The first, Restaurant Business, was produced by RR Donnelley. It is a straight replica edition of the print magazine, offering no enhancements for the reader, and no reason to use the app versus the print edition.

This might be a good thing.

The app is a free download, and once downloaded provides free access to the magazine editions, as well as text versions of the stories inside. There is no subscription charge, and no registration process. That means that the new readers attracted to the app will be unqualified readers – of no value to the advertisers of the magazine.

In contrast, the screenshots for Supple Chain Media, an app made by YUDU Media, shows that there is a "Register" button built into the app. I considered this a step in the right direction, which is what prompted me to download the app.

But once I installed this free app I discovered that the actual app varied considerably from the screenshots shown in the app description. Gone was the "register" button. In fact, the issues that were available in the app were different, as well. The App Store shows that the most recent issues available were from 2011, but the live app only gives you access to older issues.

One wonders if there were issues getting the original app approved by Apple. The basic business model of giving away content for free in exchange for vital information from the reader is a bit different from what Apple usually requires. Apple wants to protect user information from its developers, creating a serious conflict with the goals of publishers – especially B2B publishers.

The solution might be to have the app only work with existing customers of the B2B magazine. In order to use the app one must have a log-in, this can be obtained on the website of the publisher, who would approve the new account only if the reader proves to be a qualified member of the industry being served by the magazine.

This is not so different from the model used by Netflix or MLB. The Netflix app is worthless to any downloader who doesn't have a Netflix account, which is obtained on the company's website. This seems like the model to use for B2B. Unfortunately, like those Flash flipbooks sold to publishers for use on their websites, an iPad app only will prove worth launching if the publisher doesn't forget or ignore the basics of good B2B publishing.

PhotobucketPhotobucket
Left: Restaurant Business; Right: Supply Chain Media.

Morning Brief: Third time makes a pattern; from war correspondent to society editor; Globe reports that bid is being prepared for NYT-owned New England division

The spring season for American journalism means the Academy Awards and the Pulitzer Prizes. This year it also means a royal wedding. What is the old saying? "Once is chance, twice is coincidence, third time is a pattern."

Such is the state of American journalism: celebrity obsessed, self-absorbed, and prone to royalty worship. It's not a pretty sight.



I see the editor of the New York Times, Bill Keller, has a column this morning where he comes out "rooting for the Gang of Six" – the three Democrats and three Republicans who are negotiating away the final shreds of the American social contract.

Not surprisingly, Keller's column does not allow for comments.

You can, of course, post a comment on John Burns's live blog of the royal wedding. Burns, formerly the chief cheerleader at the Times for America's series of wars, and the attack dog against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, is apparently now the NYT's society editor in London.


Photobucket
The Boston Globe is reporting that a local businessman, Aaron Kushner, 38, is preparing a bid to buy the the New England Media Group from The New York Times Co. The Globe itself is part of the group, of course.

The Times attempted to sell off the group in '09, but the timing was horrible as the economy was tanking.

Chris Harte, former publisher of the Akron Beacon Journal and the Minneapolis Star Tribune is said to be advising Kushner. Ben Bradlee Jr., a former Globe editor is said to be involved in the team, as well.

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Groupon releases iPad app to attract new users

There is a tiresome debate among some media writers about the wisdom of native apps versus the web. One mobile media columnist was 100 percent against apps until recently hired by a major newspaper that does apps, now he is for apps – amazing what a raise in pay will do to some people's opinions.
Photobucket
I've never bought into the debate, however: you do native apps because a native app can do things a website can't, whether it is animation, layout, ease of navigation, whatever. But when an app is simply a substitute for the website then the wisdom of launching an app can be called into question.

The new iPad app from Groupon is like this. Groupon HD is basically an app version of the website, only less easy to use. The free app does feature a few app-like features like popout windows, but of course this can be done with the web, as well, if desired.

What the app doesn't have, however, is a landscape mode. That means that if your tablet is often found in this orientation, and mine is almost always that way when sitting on my desk because of the cover, then the app ends being less useful than the website.

The advantage of the app, of course, is its marketing value: new users will see the app in the App Store, and current users will be encouraged to download it, as well. Since the app is free, the intent here is just to encourage more sales, so what's the harm, right?

Groupon had previously launched two iPhone apps: one for users, the other for merchants to assist them in redemptions.



TNM readers may start to notice that I will be increasing the size a bit of the media app screenshots. I think they have been posted a bit small, forcing casual readers to click to enlarge. Many readers stop by and read only one story, typical of a blog, and don't bother to click on the pictures. Larger versions of the "thumbnail" shots will be helpful for them.

In the 16 months this site has been live TNM has posted over 2,600 pictures, mostly screenshots of mobile and tablet apps, as well as a few of website home pages.

The goal is creating publisher nirvana: finding the perfect marriage of technology and content

Most of this morning has been spent investigating various new digital publishing solutions, many of which may be written about in the future. But one thought that kept coming into my mind was how much of the really interesting work being done in tablet publishing looks so different from what many digital publishing solution providers are working up and selling to publishers.

The reason for this, I believe, is that we are still so early in the development of these new platforms that we have not matched up the technology with the content. Instead, we are trying to dumb down the technology to serve the content, or dumb down the content to match the technology.
Photobucket
This is why so many app users have complained about, for lack of a better term, high-tech apps that deliver "cool" experiences, but end up being pretty shallow. Conversely, readers also complain inside the App Store of magazines and newspapers that are merely "PDF versions" of the print products.

The best examples of marrying the platform's potential (iOS or Android) can be found in projects that have been created specifically for the form over an extended time – prototypes, if you will.
Our Choice is a good example of this, something that is based on an older book, has been long in development, and has just been released today. Few "conversion" projects – print into digital – have been as successful as the native designed projects unless they undergo a long incubation period like this new iPad book developed by Push Pop Press.

The holds true for magazines Odd Magazine is an exception, not so much because the programming work is better (though it is) but because it was created by someone who had the time to reimagine the print product, and was creative enough (young enough?) to see the existing project in a new way.

(An aside: strange that the word "reimagine" is considered misspelled when typed out, it's a word that I see to be using a lot when discussing New Media publishing projects.)



It is sometimes good to remember that the old platforms, like print magazines, have had similar issues to what we are experiencing with mobile and tablet publishing.

I can not tell you how many times I have sat through a presentation by a representative of R.R. Donnelley watching as the rep presented new publishing product ideas. Bind-in CDs, specially printed covers, amazing cover and text papers, 3D, etc. They wow and excite you, and get you thinking about how you can use the technology to create better issues. Rarely does the representative want to talk about your costs right then and there. Instead, days later, you get a price sheet which shows that no matter how wonderful these are the costs are often far out of reach for your publication, or its advertisers.

Even desktop publishing went through a period like we are seeing today. It almost makes you laugh to think about how far we've come. (Most people in the magazine business today can't remember what it was like when art directors "discovered" the drop shadow, often by seeing it used elsewhere and experimenting themselves until they figured it out.)

The key is that the capabilities of the new platforms need to be incorporated into the day-to-day life of the content creators. Depending on outside vendors will get you going, but it won't create the perfect marriage of technology and content.

It's always the fault of the referee

Some things are universal, I guess. No matter what sport, or even line of business, it is always the fault of the referee.

I thought about this when reading about accounts of last night's big soccer match featuring Barcelona against Real Madrid in the first leg of a Champion's League match-up. For Americans this might be a yawn, but for the sport's fans worldwide (and especially in Spain, of course) this is a heavyweight match-up.
Photobucket
With the first of two matchs played in Madrid, one would presume that Real Madrid would have the advantage, with that advantage swinging to the other side in the next match in Barcelona. But early in the second half one of Madrid's players was sent off by the German referee – shown the red card, as they do it in soccer.

To hear the coach of Madrid, José Mourinho, tell it, it was all a plot by the referee to favor Barcelona. For others, it is all sour grapes.

The Guardian, which live blogs important matches, had this to say when it happened:

62 min: IT HAD TO HAPPEN. Pepe is sent off for a foot-up challenge on Alves. He didn't make contact, though there was enough intent, and you can't be bombing around the pitch showing your studs at shin height. On the touchline, Mourinho scrunches up his nose, then applauds Alves as he's carried off. He mouths "well done" to the fourth official, and gives him the thumbs up. And is sent to the stand for his trouble. Oh me, oh my.

65 min: Mourinho, never one to turn down a photo opportunity, or the chance to cast himself in the role of martyr, plonks himself down behind some metal bars.
Barcelona then went on to victory, 2-0.



Blaming the ones that enforce the rules is a universal reaction whenever things don't go well – and as a sports fan I know that many time the refs are, indeed, to blame. But the game goes on and the rules don't change. Like Billy Martin you can scream at the umpire all you want, even kick dirt onto home plate, but it won't change a thing, just make you feel better.

Today, many in media see the ref as being Apple or Google, and publishing executives certainly love to place the blame for their struggles elsewhere. It is a universal reaction to having events go awry. The game is fixed, the ref was blind, I've been cheated.